Continued 
                  from part 1
                Part 
                  2
                Silence 
                  - a state that speaks more and better about a frame than a thousand 
                  words. Never more than in the visual medium is the value of 
                  silence understood better, and if used properly, is the emotion 
                  conveyed effectively, shifting the onus of explaining the scene 
                  to the audience allowing it to have it's own interpretation 
                  of the proceedings and derive it's own meaning of the context. 
                  Build a few words, present the argument and let the audience 
                  be known what the director exactly thinks about scene in question 
                  and the point is made. Take the words out of the equation, rely 
                  on the mood, cut back and forth between the expressions, proceed 
                  with the action and a point could made this way too. A double-edged 
                  sword, the latter way of handling a scene can literally slice 
                  the mood apart, if the setup to the silence is too shaky or 
                  if it just lacks the proper gravitas rendering the whole exercise 
                  as hypocritical and pretentious; but, move the set pieces in 
                  just the direction and place them apart at just the right distances, 
                  the result is a true work of art - the very reason why visual 
                  medium scores and ranks much above its aural counterpart, proving 
                  over and over again, that a picture is indeed worth a thousand 
                  words.
                Tulasi, 
                  who has just been acquitted by the court of murder, stand on 
                  the steps of court. Her mother had just been dragged away by 
                  the police, kicking and screaming and hurling curses and abuses 
                  at her. Her hopes dashed and her life doomed. Alone, she awaits 
                  her true verdict of future. Her uncle comes back and tries to 
                  grab her and drag her back into the wretched life that she greatly 
                  detested. And the scene calms down here. All that we could hear 
                  are the crushing footsteps (typical of "aaku cheppulu") 
                  that resonate in the halls of justice of Sankara Sastry. An 
                  impressive figure (aided by the low-angle tilt of the camera 
                  to enhance the commanding stature), he looks on at the uncle 
                  who had his hand on Tulasi's shoulder, from the top of the stairs. 
                  Silence rules on. The hand is drawn away. Sankara Sastry walks 
                  by the uncle and Tulasi joins him. Uncle looks on mutely and 
                  the scene cuts away to both of them riding the horse drawn carriage 
                  speeding away through the streets much to the astonishment of 
                  the onlookers.
                Dissect 
                  this scene and see how much information was infused into those 
                  last few shots without being aided by the otherwise wonderful 
                  words of Jandhyala, one can call it a true tribute and deep 
                  respect of Viswanath to the visual medium. The low-angle of 
                  Sankara Sastry standing on top of the steps of the court hall, 
                  a principled man with an unblemished and untainted record, looking 
                  down upon the uncle (He who has not sinned shall cast the first 
                  stone - well, Sankara Sastry can). The air of confidence and 
                  the gait of proper culture, his hands folded in front, the look 
                  of seriousness in his face ripping away whatever faux-authority 
                  that the uncle had over Tulasi. The walk down the stairs down 
                  to them, a glance at Tulasi and the walk away. The instructions 
                  to Tulasi were not conveyed and implicit. The order to the uncle 
                  was unexplained and unnecessary. The acceptance of Tulasi by 
                  Sankara Sastry was unspoken. While the carriage zooms fast in 
                  the streets of the city with eager onlookers, the sense of regality 
                  conveying that Sastry does not care about what the world would 
                  think of a pious man together with a woman of disrepute. The 
                  entire sequence is just one among the several poignant silences 
                  that Viswanath peppered in Sankaraabharanam, each silence varied 
                  but equally effective as every other. Consider the scene when 
                  Tulasi meets Sankara Sastry in his compartment the very first 
                  time, when she runs away from her house. No introductions, no 
                  drawn out dialogues, no explanations - a true testament of the 
                  ability of the direction to trust the scene, to trust the audience 
                  and more importantly, to trust to the value of silence.
                
                It 
                  is not only when dealing with one particular emotion alone did 
                  Viswanath employ the services of silence. When Balu comes to 
                  know that Madhavi has got him an entry into National Dance festival, 
                  emotions take over and silences the words. Balu's mixed sense 
                  of happiness, elation, indebtedness, respect, admiration, and 
                  that important emotion of being finally recognized even by a 
                  single person who places him next to the stalwarts - Silence 
                  rules and lets the mood spill over. It is very prudent of the 
                  director to make that important decision of whether to translate 
                  those feelings into words or hold back on the words and let 
                  expressions interpret the emotions. Sivayya is helpless in making 
                  a decision, whether to let Lalitha and her kid leave him and 
                  have a seemingly better life with her father-in-law or spend 
                  a contended life with whatever they had. One needs to appreciate 
                  Viswnath's sensibility and judgement here, because of Sivayya's 
                  inability in framing complex words around complex thoughts. 
                  He is a kid at heart and acts like a kid with a big heart. He 
                  cannot verbally express the conflict between what is good and 
                  what not right. He starts to sulk at a corner and when Lalitha 
                  catches him in his solitude, she (we) finds him, fiddling with 
                  his fiddle, throwing his hands around, unable to overcome his 
                  sorrow nor able to control his emotions. Again, no dialogues, 
                  no words, no sounds.
                kaadaa 
                  mounam prati bhaavaaniki bhaashyam
                (Cont'd 
                  in the next part - Viswanath's hardest challenge - Sirivennela)
                
                  Tell Srinivas 
                  Kanchibhotla how you liked the article.