|  
               A 
                friend and I went to see Chandni Bar. It depicts the real-life 
                anguish of a woman who dances in a bar in to support herself and 
                her uncle while attempting to raise two children on the fringes 
                of Bombay's criminal underworld. It is a compelling story beautifully 
                shot, portrayed with quiet dignity by Hyderabad export and sometime 
                beauty queen Tabu. 
              My 
                friend instructed me to tell his parents we were going to see 
                Ajnabee, a film about partner swapping. It reminded me 
                of the joke (you can attribute it to William Safire) where the 
                guy wants to conceal the fact he's looking through the Victoria's 
                Secret catalog so he covers it with a copy of Hustler. 
              The 
                reason I couldn't tell his parents what we were watching is because 
                the CBFC has branded Chandni Bar with an 'A' rating. 'A' 
                is India's equivalent of the American 'R', meaning that children 
                are not admitted without adult supervision. Quite unlike the 'R' 
                rating, which often increases box office appeal, the scarlet 'A' 
                next to a movie's title relegates it to commercial and cultural 
                insignificance. In the Deccan Chronicle, meanwhile, Man 
                Two Woman and Bed Timing (from bed to worse) carry 
                no rating at all and are listed proudly alongside Jurassic 
                Park III. 
              Nudity, 
                violence, drug use, foul language, even Taboo Number One, the 
                kiss-Chandni Bar contains none of these. (I'm afraid most 
                of you just lost interest.) What undoubtedly earned it this dubious 
                distinction were two rape scenes (one homosexual) depicted with 
                great restraint, and soliciting of prostitution. It is, to repeat, 
                a true story. 
              Several 
                parents nonetheless opted to take their children, all of whom 
                looked younger than ten-possibly old enough to be scarred but 
                not to derive any kind of lesson. My friend agreed it would be 
                salutary for broader audiences to be exposed to these sorts of 
                stories but felt that some of the scenes (you can guess) should 
                be banned outright. Baby steps. 
              Nuvvu 
                Nenu is the worst film I have seen in years, often senselessly 
                violent even while masquerading as a tender love story. In fact, 
                there's no love story at all: one minute they're antagonists 
                and the next they're inseparable. Since some kids belong to families 
                who still consider a schoolyard crush tantamount to a marriage 
                proposal-as with Naipaul's Mr Biswas, so with Mr Reddy-implanting 
                this model of love in teenagers' heads could result in lifelong 
                suffering. 
              The 
                frequency and nonchalance of violence throughout Nuvvu Nenu 
                seems more dangerous, because more likely to be emulated, than 
                anything kids could pick up from Chandni Bar. While the 
                latter gazes steadily at the pain haunting its subjects, the former 
                keeps busy unrelentingly inflicting more. With a singleminded 
                determination, the parents of Nuvvu Nenu's star-crossed 
                pair pummel, bludgeon, scald, bitch-slap, and dispatch scythe-wielding 
                maniacs in an effort matched only by Doc Hopper's pursuit of Kermit 
                the Frog. Rarely has a film been more adept at traversing the 
                narrow line between brutality and parody. Most awfully earnest 
                was the bloodied and bruised final love song, a larger-than-life 
                reminder of which assaults southbound travelers at Lakdi-ka-pul. 
              So 
                the rating system colludes with prevailing mores to purvey violence 
                for popular consumption even as it suppresses the stories of those 
                who actually suffer. Stateside, where views are so much more enlightened 
                (as we witness daily on CNN), we take some of each, kabhi kabhi. 
                While the industry worries that song sequences will mar Asoka's 
                reception by international audiences, I can think of a few other 
                hurdles that need getting over before serious films get their 
                due here at home. 
               About 
                the author: Matt Daniels, 23, holds an A.B. in Philosophy 
                from Harvard University. His long-awaited return to Hyderabad 
                was sponsored by Let's Go Publications, whose India 2002 guide 
                hits shelves everywhere this Diwali. You can email him at mdaniels@idlebrain.com. 
              Other 
                article by Matt: Daddy review 
               |