Disclaimer: Spoilers ahead. Please read this only after watching the film.
The basic story idea seems to have been taken from the Hollywood classic ‘Usual Suspects’. Concept of narrating a fictitious horror story in a thriller came first in Telugu films with Pizza.
Though the screenplay of the film is good, the director has taken a few liberties. ‘Usual Suspects’ film is about telling an imaginary story by using the names/brands written on objects in that room. The investigators realise it after the suspect is let off. In ‘Bhaagamathie’ too, Anushka creates an imaginary story based on wordings and books in Bhaagamathie Bungalow and misleads the investigator. But in the process, the director has deliberately misled audiences in these two aspects
1. Home Ministry sending an investigator without briefing her with the facts they have. (this is purely to make audience to presume that Jayaram is good and HomeMinistry/Govt is bad at the beginning of the film)
2. The scenes in which Murali Sharma enters Bhagamathie Bungalow with an intention to shoot (Bhaagamathie nailing her palm, burning of the book etc). These scenes are shot to establish that Bhaagamathie is a ghost. Since it’s not on spy cameras, it’s only meant to convey to audiences (not to the investigator)
People wouldn’t mind such scenes in a regular commercial film. But a content/screenplay based film like Bhagamathie, these misleading scenes may not go well with narrative! |